I present this as an 'open letter' so that those who have pondered some of the back scene dialogue have something more coherent about which to think.
__________________________________________________________________________
Jonathan,
You left Perplexus recently in a supposed temper, particularly accusing me of having sent to you a virus in an email which actually originated from you email ISP.

You attempted to intimidate me via an Email Forward of that document obviously knowing that I would be unable to read it. And yet, I was smart enough to realize that the text was encoded in English, or standard ASCII. NO, I ran a Chinese/Japanese/Korean program across it. Much of it looked good, but not completely. Sanskrit!? I don’t have a plugin for that, but could I be so close to certain that the document was thus encoded that we need to discuss it any further?

You claimed to be ‘offended’ that I, and somehow you drew Perplexus into this. You seemed to be inferring that I was an employee of the site. On that issue, you actually queried as to how many people were employed by Perplexus. I’ve got news for you. Perplexus is owned by Levik for the benefit of people who are prepared to freely respect a problem solving community and its basic rules. Levik has delegated some operations to certain persons who have duly belonged here, and as far as I know, their service is completely voluntary, to provide for theirs and our enjoyment.

Offended? You? No, ME!!! I am offended. You claimed that I had planted a virus upon you! I gave you back proof positive that the ‘suspect document’ was from your ISP, but you ignored the proof!!

Your Ego was flattened when first Larry rebuked you and then I gave him my support. This was the way that you rewarded me for attempting < PRE > tab solutions.

Your inference that Perplexus (or its visitors) have given out your email (which I know is quite visible) falls under the category of law related to Libel & Slander! That you should be the targeted person of other Problem Sites is just an extension of the stupid Charade that you have been playing soon after you joined this site.

I’ve seen your apologies, your ‘commitments’ to comply with site rules, and a comment from Chatterbox that said:
“<Jonathan Chang>: Last words to me. If not, the whole chatterbox looks like full of my comments. I never scold & blame brianjn. It is just my curiosity. I never think of treating you as enemy to you. Nice chat to you.

Second last sentence! You falsely challenged me once. You denied my proof. Sherlocke Holmes, character of Sir Conan Doyle, would have no problems destroying the C*** that you have presented of the last few weeks; inconsistencies, whatever!

Oh! I am not Mensa, BUT, there are some here who are and are also – wise - remember? IQ & wisdom!!