I have been browsing problems that do not yet have an "approved solution".

Sometime ago, a small team of us sought to address "Problems without Solutions" (for a better name).

This exercise was convened by Tristan , one of our more recent scholars.

The project was very good, accomplishing many of his goals.

Now, as I look back over recent problems since that time, we have many where the proposer has not posted a solution when both the problem has been solved and the solution resides on the Perplexus server.

I am firstly posting this as a potential reminder that some of us have problem solutions to be addressed.

Secondly, I guess I am readdressing Tristan's thoughts at the time [they are not, unfortunately available if you see 5 Forums]. Essentially he was asking, and there was some comment, about what should be the protocol of Scholars in posting solutions where:

a. they are deserved, over a length of time,

b. they have been on site for such a length that we'd all like to see a solution,

and

c. though, not solved, the solution deserves to be published.

Don't accept this as 'quoting' Tristan. I believe these were however his sentiments at the time and why the project went ahead.

<hr>
My concern now is, having addressed those 'problems' to a limited degree, how might we progress?

I once suggested a similar thought to levik, a bit like the "Bonus" question that comes up whenever you refresh the home page but he wasn't up to that.