All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info
Discussion Forums
Login: Password:Remember me: Sign up! | Forgot password

Forums > Commons
A place to come and discuss the features of this site, as well as suggest/request additions and modifications. Oh yeah, and Bug reports too.
Captain Paradox
2004-01-07 18:02:59
How old is flooble?

I've noticed that many threads begin in 2003. How old is flooble? Or the flooble forums, if they weren't started at the same time.

SilverKnight
2004-01-07 18:25:16
Re: How old is flooble?

Well, if you went to http://flooble.com/perplexus/show.php?pid=1, the first problem on Flooble, you would see that it was posted on March 28, 2002.

So... gettin' close to 2 years old.

Captain Paradox
2004-01-07 22:05:15
Re: How old is flooble?

Thanks, Silverknight.

Steve
2004-01-12 19:07:10
Re: How old is flooble?

I know levik is the administrator of flooble but did he create it as well?

SilverKnight
2004-01-12 19:50:17
Re: How old is flooble?

And Levik looked upon the chaos and saw that it was lacking of order. And Levik said "Let There Be Flooble". And so Flooble was. And Levik looked upon his creation. And Levik saw that it was good.

Within his creation, He spawned aspiring novices which prospered in this Eden. And to sustain them, He provided conundrums. But the novices flailed around miserably, lacking direction and wasting much of their idle time. So Levik created unto them a path of righteousness, for which they now had purpose. And they could begin the traversal of the path, being students. And Levik saw that it was good.

But they floundered in their inability to recategorize their submissions. And Levik bestowed upon a few this power. And He called them apprentices. And Levik saw that it was good.

Levik wondered at his creation with much love. And He spent much time tending to the submissions. And He saw that his creatures longed to take part in the ritualistic judgement of the submissions. And He desired to focus His attention on other endeavors, to share His gifts. So Levik confered a select few the ability to foresee submissions with an oracle-like ability to judge those submissions that were Flooble-worthy. He called these few journeymen. And Levik saw that it was good.

Again, Levik looked down from on high. He found that he still spent much time improving his creation. Levik chose to remove from himself the duty of excessively nurturing his children. And He saw several exceptional journeymen to whom he would grant the capability to spawn those enigmas that the journeymen deemed Flooble-worthy, only those that would provide great nourishment. To these extraordinary few beings, Levik gave the name scholars. And the scholars would help with minor administrative duties, tending to and encouraging the lesser creatures.

And He saw that it was good.

levik
2004-01-12 21:19:49
Re: How old is flooble?

Amen

fwaff
2004-01-13 05:13:18
Re: How old is flooble?

Careful SK, or Charlie and DJ might start arguing about whether or not Levik exists.

Popstar Dave
2004-01-13 07:03:42
Re: How old is flooble?

It's ok, Charlie's already written an algorithm that shows that he does exist.

FatBoy
2004-01-14 11:55:22
Hey, Charlie!!!

Cool,

Lets see if we can get him to post it.

If he can prove that Levik exists, can he prove that there is really only one Tim Axoy and the others exist only in pontentie??

Sam
2004-01-15 12:03:29
Re: How old is flooble?

Proof of the inexistance of Levik:

S: If S is true, Levik does not exist
Logically, S must be either True or False...
...


:)

Captain Paradox
2004-01-18 16:03:18
Re: How old is flooble?

How about this:

T: if T is false, Levik does not exist.

Well, that doesn't work either. Charlie, where are you?

Steve
2004-01-19 20:26:11
Re: How old is flooble?

enough of all this algorith junk, levik does exist right it isn't just some guy who posts as someone else too?

Captain Paradox
2004-01-21 08:34:45
Re: How old is flooble?

Okay, my last proof of levik:

PROOF OF LEVIK
U: if and only if U is false, levik does not exist.

If U is false, then a true statement would be
V: if and only if U is false, levik does exist

If U is true, then levik does exist, because he can't not exist.

Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information