All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > General
Gravity experiment (Posted on 2006-05-04) Difficulty: 3 of 5
You are studying the effects of gravity on clay spheres. You conjecture that they will shatter... but at what height? You want to find out the smallest integral height in meters from which the clay will fall and shatter.

Unfortunately, you only have four identical clay spheres, at least until the company that makes them starts returning your calls. Also, you only have enough time for 8 tests, during which the general area will be cleared of people. Last time someone did such an experiment, an egg... well, it was messy. Up to what height can you test the effects of gravity on the clay?

  Submitted by Tristan    
Rating: 4.3333 (3 votes)
Solution: (Hide)
If you are stuck, you first might want to hear about the experiment with eggs before giving up.

In order to find the height at which a sphere shatters, it is necessary to test at exactly that height, and one meter below, to be sure that the shattering point is neither higher nor lower. However, we don't need to test every single height, because we can tell whether the shattering point is above or below wherever we test. Therefore, we should try to test as high as possible in order to eliminate the most possibilities, but we have to make sure that we have enough tests and spheres to test all heights below, should it break.

Therefore, the basic strategy for each test is to drop from height N meters above the ground such that if it breaks, the remaining spheres and tests are exactly enough to test up to N-1 meters. For example, perhaps we knew that with 6 tests and 2 spheres, we could test up to 21 meters. If we had 7 tests and 3 spheres, our very first drop would be at 22 meters. If it breaks, we use the remaining 6 tests and two spheres to test all heights below 22. If it doesn't break, we test even higher.

Let us express the above in mathematical form. Let f(t,s) be the height up to which it is possible to test if you have s spheres and t tests.
f(t,s) = ∑(i=1 to t) ( f(t-i,s-1) + 1 )
f(0,s) = f(t,0) = 0

We could use this recursive formula to find our answer, but for those interested, here is the non-recursive formula and a proof.

Proposal:
f(t,s) = ∑(i=1 to s) ( C(t,i) )
Proof by induction:
f(t,0) = 0, as given
Assume true for s=k
f(t,k) = ∑(i=1 to k) ( C(t,i) )
f(t,k+1) = ∑(j=1 to t) ( f(t-j,k) + 1 )
f(t,k+1) = t + ∑(j=1 to t) ( ∑(i=1 to k) ( C(t-j,i) ) )
f(t,k+1) = t + ∑(i=1 to k) ( ∑(j=1 to t) ( C(t-j,i) ) )
f(t,k+1) = C(t,1) + ∑(i=1 to k) ( C(t,i+1) )
f(t,k+1) = ∑(i=1 to k+1) ( C(t,i) )
QED

Using the above equation, f(8,4) = C(8,4) + C(8,3) + C(8,2) + C(8,1) = 70 + 56 + 28 + 8 = 162.

It has been noted, correctly, in the comments that this formula can be explained by the number of possible test results. If 1 represents a break, and 0 no break, each string of test results might look like 10000010 or 01101010. Each string of test results can only correspond to exactly one conclusion. Note that there can be no more than 4 ones, since there are only 4 spheres. Also, if there are 8 zeroes, the conclusion is that the height at which the spheres break is above 162.

Comments: ( You must be logged in to post comments.)
  Subject Author Date
re(2): SolutionPriscilla2006-05-09 18:11:31
re: SolutionCory Taylor2006-05-09 17:21:41
SolutionTristan2006-05-09 16:20:34
re(3): QuestionRichard2006-05-08 20:38:03
re(4): QuestionSalil2006-05-08 19:48:21
re(3): QuestionEric2006-05-08 16:23:30
re(2): QuestionEric2006-05-08 16:22:01
re(2): QuestionSalil2006-05-07 22:19:02
re: QuestionRichard2006-05-07 12:17:24
QuestionSalil2006-05-07 10:41:47
re(2): Scale It DownRichard2006-05-06 12:48:13
Some Thoughtsre: Scale It Downtomarken2006-05-06 09:20:04
Scale It DownRichard2006-05-05 23:50:38
re: Detailed SolutionEric2006-05-05 22:03:27
Detailed SolutionSalil2006-05-05 21:31:54
SolutionRevised solutionSalil2006-05-05 13:43:27
SolutionMy solutionSalil2006-05-05 13:20:25
Drop Plan Part IEric2006-05-05 03:04:00
Solutionre(2): That's the breaks (Possible correct solution)Dej Mar2006-05-05 02:20:38
SolutionEric2006-05-05 02:19:37
A Scheme That WorksRichard2006-05-05 00:15:57
Hints/Tipsre: That's the breaks (Possible correct solution)tomarken2006-05-04 22:10:22
That's the breaks (Possible correct solution)Dej Mar2006-05-04 19:00:10
re(4): Possibly right solution, partial expl.John2006-05-04 15:39:43
Hints/Tipsre(3): Possibly right solution, partial expl.tomarken2006-05-04 15:14:09
re(2): Possibly right solution, partial expl.John2006-05-04 15:08:15
Solutionre: Possibly right solution, partial expl.tomarken2006-05-04 14:17:26
SolutionPossibly right solution, partial expl.Jer2006-05-04 14:09:26
First thoughtEric2006-05-04 12:53:36
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (3)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information