All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Logic
Your conclusion requested (Posted on 2016-11-03) Difficulty: 3 of 5
i. If there is a king in the hand then there is an ace, or if there isn’t a king in the hand then there is an ace, but not both.
ii. There is a king in the hand.

Given the above premises, what can you infer?

No Solution Yet Submitted by Ady TZIDON    
Rating: 3.6667 (3 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
Some Thoughts My conclusion | Comment 1 of 9

i. There is an ace or there is no king or there is a king or there is an ace and not a king

ii. needs no rewriting.

Since there is a king, per ii, one of the or'ed conditions in i is met, so the other factors involved in premise i are irrelevant.

The only thing we know is there is a king in the hand.

That is, the second part of premise i might be the true part, based on the falsehood of the premise part of the if...then... construct of that second part making that second part the true part of the or.

  Posted by Charlie on 2016-11-03 09:22:32
Please log in:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password

Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (7)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Copyright © 2002 - 2018 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information