All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Logic
At the Olympic Games (3) (Posted on 2003-10-13) Difficulty: 3 of 5
After the weight lifting event, the announcer said “Either Holland was better than Italy, or Greece won gold.”

An Italian reporter heard that, and commented that even knowing his own country’s final place, he wasn’t able to deduce the other places.

Curiously, a Dutch reporter who knew Holland’s final place, and who hadn’t heard the other reporter, made exactly the same remark.

Which were the final places?

See The Solution Submitted by Federico Kereki    
Rating: 3.2143 (14 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
I'm with fwaff on this | Comment 5 of 15 |
Holland could not have come third. If it did, then Holland was not better than Italy, & so Greece must have gold. The Dutch reporter would then have deduced the order Greece, Italy, Holland (unless of course he wasn't all that bright).
Italy could not have won; because then Holland was not better than Italy, and so Greece must have won (I'm assuming there were no ties). If Italy was last, Holland was better than Italy, and so Greece did not win gold - this would allow the Italian reporter to deduce the order Holland, Greece, Italy. So Italy must have been second (the reporter then wouldn't know who was above and below).
If Holland is not last, & not second (because Italy is) it must have wone gold.
This gives the order: Holland, Italy, Greece.
  Posted by DrBob on 2003-10-13 14:23:44
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (15)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information