All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Numbers
More chameleons (Posted on 2002-07-30) Difficulty: 3 of 5
Long ago, there existed a species of fighting chameleons. These chameleons were divided into six types of matching color and strength:
  • Black were the strongest, followed by
  • blue,
  • green,
  • orange,
  • yellow and
  • white which were the weakest.

    Whenever two chameleons of the same color met, they would fight to the death and the victor would become stronger and change color (eg white to yellow). Black chameleons would fight eternally.

    The small island of Ula was initially populated by a group of fighting chameleons. For this group

    a) the colors present each had an equal number of chameleons (for example, group = 3 black, 3 green and 3 yellow)

    b) it was not made up entirely of white chameleons

    After all the possible fighting was done, there remained one black and green and no blue or orange chameleons.

    How many white chameleons remained in the island? Prove it.

  •   Submitted by Cheradenine    
    Rating: 3.5000 (14 votes)
    Solution: (Hide)
    The island of Ula is really a huge adding machine, whose basic mechanism is chameleons. Once youve realised this, its a matter of translation (:)

    a): all the number added are equal. this type of addition has a name, multiplication:

    chameleons per color * colors present = survivors n * c = s

    b): c != 1 (im using != as not equal)

    "After all the fighting..": n != 1.

    We know that s = 1010XX, s = 101000-101011 = 40-43. 41 and 43 are prime, and s = n * c. since n != 1 != c, s != 41,43

    so s = 40, 42 = 101000, 101010.

    No white chameleons left, regardless of yellow.

    You can also prove this systematically, by obtaining all initial combinations which result in 1010XX and finding all with white = 0. This would inadvertently prove that 41,43 are prime.

    Btw, confusion aside, i dont think this puzzle deserved a rating of 1 :)

    Comments: ( You must be logged in to post comments.)
      Subject Author Date
    re: my apologiesLigiaOzimek2021-10-04 08:03:08
    AnswerK Sengupta2008-03-15 05:08:34
    SolutionSolutionDej Mar2007-05-03 23:51:30
    re(4): Duh!tomarken2006-03-02 16:15:34
    re: I must be missing a big part of the puzzle...john2005-06-08 17:08:14
    Some Thoughtsre(3): Duh!john2005-06-08 16:57:31
    I must be missing a big part of the puzzle...Erik O.2005-01-12 15:44:54
    OopsGautam2003-01-21 16:21:28
    My AnswerGautam2003-01-21 15:06:45
    re(2): Duh!kyle2003-01-08 18:04:37
    re: Duh!TomM2002-07-30 16:29:44
    Duh!Emma2002-07-30 11:34:05
    re(2): solutionlucky2002-07-30 05:37:41
    re: solutionCheradenine2002-07-30 04:49:00
    re(3): solution (explanation)levik2002-07-30 04:46:55
    re(2): solution (explanation)TomM2002-07-30 04:13:09
    SolutionsolutionTomM2002-07-30 04:04:41
    Some ThoughtsNumbersNick Reed2002-07-30 02:07:32
    my apologiesCheradenine2002-07-29 22:09:01
    Perhaps...levik2002-07-29 20:28:41
    Questionre(3): change wording..TomM2002-07-29 17:55:18
    re(2): change wording..Nick Reed2002-07-29 13:58:47
    re: change wording..levik2002-07-29 09:00:24
    change wording..Cheradenine2002-07-29 07:34:48
    Any number?Ender2002-07-29 07:03:10
    re: What am I missing?Cheradenine2002-07-29 06:59:51
    QuestionWhat am I missing?Nick Reed2002-07-29 06:41:52
    Please log in:
    Login:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Sign up! | Forgot password


    Search:
    Search body:
    Forums (0)
    Newest Problems
    Random Problem
    FAQ | About This Site
    Site Statistics
    New Comments (10)
    Unsolved Problems
    Top Rated Problems
    This month's top
    Most Commented On

    Chatterbox:
    Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information