All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Logic
At the Olympic Games (5) (Posted on 2004-08-30) Difficulty: 3 of 5
It was logical that four asian countries (Japan, Korea, Laos and Malaysia) should be the judo finalists, but I couldn’t learn the relative standings.

A reporter told me “Laos won silver, and/or Malaysia won bronze.” Other reporter added “Japan won gold, and/or Korea won bronze.” A third one added “Laos won gold, and/or Japan won silver.”

I couldn’t make heads or tails out of this, until I remembered that in judo, two bronze medals are awarded. Which were the standings?

See The Solution Submitted by Federico Kereki    
Rating: 2.6000 (10 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
solution | Comment 11 of 21 |
Each reporter has at least one correct comment.  Reporter #1's comment that Laos won silver is negated by either of R#3 comments one of which is correct.  Therefore R#1 second comment is correct (Maylasia wins bronze).   Likewise R#2 cannot have Japan win gold as again both of R#3's comments contradict it and at least one of R#3's comments is true.  Therefore #2's second comment is correct (Korea wins bronze).  Since Laos didn't win silver nor Japan the gold (these were both negated) Then it is Laos with the gold and Japan with silver making R#3's both comments correct.
  Posted by nancy on 2004-09-01 15:55:59
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (13)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information