All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Paradoxes
Oh my, Protagoras (Posted on 2002-10-19) Difficulty: 3 of 5
A Lawyer named Protagoras teaches law for a hefty fee. He advertises his skills as a teacher by offering his students a contract, which states that they do not have to pay him until they have won their first case. If the student loses their first case, then they don't have to pay Protagoras at all.

One student of Protagoras sees a loophole, takes the course and fininshes it. After that, the student avoids arguing any cases. Since the student has not yet won his first case, he avoids paying Protagoras.

Protagoras feels cheated, and sues the student for his fee. When the case comes to trial, the student represents himself. If the student loses the case, then by the terms of their original agreement, there is no fee for the course. If the student wins the case however, then, since its the student's first case, there will be a fee. (But, of course, winning the case means that the student doesn't have to pay the fee, while losing it means that the fee must be paid.)

Will the student be obliged to pay Protagoras' fee or not?

See The Solution Submitted by JOTU    
Rating: 3.1667 (18 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
re: Here is my ingenious solution | Comment 20 of 37 |
(In reply to Here is my ingenious solution by Dan)

I think I can improve on that !!

(a) If the student loses this, his first case, the court will order him to pay Protagoras. The student will immediately appeal, this time using a different lawyer to represent him, rather than representing himself. In this appeal, his lawyer will argue, successfully, that the student has not won his first case, and so must not pay Protagoras. Obviously the court will agree. The student is home free -- clearly he does not have to pay.
(b) On the other hand, if the student wins this, his first case, the court will free him of his debt to Protagoras. Then Protagoras will immediately appeal, citing the legal ground of "changed circumstances" - the student has just won his first case, and so in this second case, Protagoras will argue, successfully, that the student must pay the debt. The student will pay Protagoras.

  Posted by Dan Erickson on 2003-08-22 12:00:40

Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (10)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information