All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Logic
At the Olympic Games (6) (Posted on 2004-09-27) Difficulty: 2 of 5
Argentine, Brazil, Colombia, Dominican Republic and Equator competed at the Olympic Games, placing first through fifth in an event. They said:

Argentine: "I was not last."
Brazil: "Canada got the bronze."
Canada: "Argentine ended behind Equator."
Dominican Republic: "Equator got silver."
Equator: "Dominican Republic didn't get gold."

The gold and silver winners lied, but the other three told the truth. How did the event end?

  Submitted by Federico Kereki    
Rating: 2.6923 (26 votes)
Solution: (Hide)
Let's write A, B, C, D, and E, instead of the whole names.

A couldn't be 1st or 2nd, for he would be telling the truth, or 5th, for he would be lying, so he was 3rd or 4th.

If D was telling the truth, then E would be lying, and thus D would be 1st, and lying; thus, D is lying, and he is 1st or 2nd.

If E was lying, D would be 1st, so E would have to be 2nd, and then D would have been telling the truth; thus, E is 3rd, 4th or 5th, and D must be 2nd.

Now, only B or C could be 1st. If B isn't 1st, as he couldn't be 2nd, he'd have to be 4th or 5th because C would be 3rd, but nobody would be 1st; thus, B was 1st, and C isn't 3rd, and A ended behind E.

The only solution is then B, D, E, A and C.

Comments: ( You must be logged in to post comments.)
  Subject Author Date
SolutionI getFrankM2008-05-13 07:27:12
SolutionProblem SolutionK Sengupta2007-05-04 12:07:13
SolutionanswerClara Levy2005-02-07 19:59:55
answerjuan m. perez2005-02-04 22:59:17
solutionwhome?2005-01-23 18:36:30
SolutionMalorie2004-11-20 19:15:13
Solutioncezar2004-11-18 16:16:32
No SubjectMalvika2004-10-20 02:04:37
got itkelly2004-10-19 17:11:27
SolutionBradley2004-10-16 23:35:07
solutionMichelle2004-10-16 16:34:14
my theoryFranky2004-10-15 09:54:27
SolutionCraig2004-10-12 00:32:22
re: SolutionBarb2004-10-11 16:01:45
SolutionSolutionAmanda2004-10-10 02:44:46
solution, I think.Sarah2004-10-08 19:38:21
re: The Actualnikki2004-10-08 09:33:50
The Actualtresspasser2004-10-08 09:14:59
re(2): Kathy EdmondsKatie Edwards2004-10-08 07:52:27
Some Thoughtssolution i thinksubhojit saha2004-10-07 16:59:42
re: Kathy Edmondsnikki2004-10-05 17:39:50
Kathy EdmondsKatie Edwards2004-10-05 17:03:30
Blame CanadaRandyOrton2004-10-05 11:00:40
solutionDetti Herman2004-10-04 15:16:59
QuestionKatie Edwards = Eagle Eye (? for Frederico!)nikki2004-10-04 14:46:27
Columbia or Canada?Katie Edwards2004-10-04 14:24:04
hardtheo2004-10-03 16:15:45
re: Solution - with explanation - Can please some one verify approach?Federico Kereki2004-10-02 05:01:16
re: Nikkinikki2004-10-01 15:34:50
Solution - with explanation - Can please some one verify approach?vineet jain2004-10-01 04:33:01
re: No Subject - Davenikki2004-09-30 16:59:00
re(2): Uh, Hello?nikki2004-09-30 16:57:43
re: Uh, Hello?Andrea2004-09-30 16:17:26
re: Alternate Solution?snow2004-09-30 10:44:58
Some ThoughtsAlternate Solution?snow2004-09-30 10:43:01
No Subjectdave2004-09-28 08:45:30
Solutionsolutiondave2004-09-28 08:43:32
SolutionEasy funRuth2004-09-27 18:30:47
NikkiRandyOrton2004-09-27 15:42:03
re: Wownikki2004-09-27 15:38:02
Solutionre: Uh, Hello?nikki2004-09-27 15:29:05
Uh, Hello?RandyOrton2004-09-27 13:34:18
SolutionAnswer (fully explained)Old Original Oskar!2004-09-27 12:15:58
WowRandyOrton2004-09-27 10:52:17
Special NoteRandyOrton2004-09-27 10:28:09
SolutionI am so smartRandyOrton2004-09-27 10:25:10
SolutionSolutionDavid Shin2004-09-27 10:22:39
Please log in:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password

Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (6)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Copyright © 2002 - 2021 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information