All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Numbers
Ordering Pairs (Posted on 2004-11-06) Difficulty: 3 of 5
What are the smallest positive integers A, B, C, and D such that A+A > A+B > A+C > B+B > B+C > A+D > C+C > B+D > C+D > D+D ?

Note: Of all solutions, choose the one with the smallest A, then smallest B if there are more than one with the smallest A, etc.

See The Solution Submitted by Brian Smith    
Rating: 3.7500 (4 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
Solution Solution | Comment 8 of 10 |

We have
A+A > A+B > A+C > B+B > B+C > A+D > C+C > B+D > C+D > D+D.  (0)

The inequalities can be summarized as: A > B > C > D, and a few others.  We use some of those others to derive inequalities connecting the differences between successive numbers: A-B, B-C, and C-D.

A+C > B+B implies A-B > B-C (subtract B+C)
B+C > A+D implies C-D > A-B (subtract B+D)

From (0) we also have B+B-(C+C) > 2, so B-C > 1.

Putting these together, we have C-D > A-B > B-C > 1.  (1)

Note that (0) is satisfied if we add a constant to each variable.  So, without loss of generality, we may set D = 1.

The smallest possible choices from (1) are B-C = 2, A-B = 3, C-D = 4.

This yields (D, C, B, A) = (1, 5, 7, 10), which satisfies all of the original inequalities, and is minimal for D, C, B, and A.


  Posted by Nick Hobson on 2004-11-14 17:22:55
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (9)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information