(In reply to
re: solution by charlie by Ady TZIDON)
The formula
6  (5/6)^n  (4/6)^n  (3/6)^n  (2/6)^n  (1/6)^n
just didn't come to me directly. I think the explanation you give is not quite adequate, in that it seems to imply that the probabilities of other values are merely subtracted.
Looking back I can see how the above works, somewhat more directly than I had: for example, the (1/6)^n is the probability that nothing higher than a 1 shows up. In taking an expected value one would expect to subtract 5 times this probability, as 1 is 5 less than 6. But this is actually accomplished as, for example, the (2/6)^6 incorporates all those circumstances in which there is nothing higher than a 2, including those circumstances again in which nothing higher than a 1 appeared. So ultimately, those situations are indeed counted 5 times, while those in which 2 is definitely the highest are counted 4 times, etc.
With this explanation, I can understand the direct going to this formula.

Posted by Charlie
on 20041208 19:48:33 