All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Just Math
Consecutive Primes (Posted on 2005-01-24) Difficulty: 2 of 5
Show that the sum of two consecutive odd primes has at least 3 (not necessarily distinct) prime factors. For example,


See The Solution Submitted by David Shin    
Rating: 3.1667 (6 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
Some Thoughts Some thoughts on a particular case Comment 6 of 6 |

If we were given the sum of twin primes rather than two consecutive odd primes, then the solution would have been as follows.

Let the twin primes be p and p+2.
For p =3, Sum(3, 5) = 2*2*2, as shown in the problem text.
For p>=5, p must necessarily possess the form 6t-1, where t is a positive integer.
Thus, Sum(p, p+2) = Sum(6t-1, 6t+1) = 12t = 2*2*3*t

Now, for t>=2, t can be either prime or composite.
Thus, for p>=13, Sum(p, p+2) will always contain at least four (not necessarily distinct) prime factors.

Considering that neither (13, 15) nor (15, 17) constitute the set of twin primes, while (17, 19) is a valid set, we can now assert that:

The sum of two twin  primes will always have at least 4 (not necessarily distinct) prime factors, whenever the lesser prime is at least 17.

Edited on May 11, 2007, 1:10 pm
  Posted by K Sengupta on 2007-05-11 13:02:14

Please log in:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password

Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (2)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Copyright © 2002 - 2019 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information