All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Numbers
Circle of numbers (Posted on 2005-05-27) Difficulty: 2 of 5
Over 2000 numbers are around a circle. Each number is the sum of its left and right neighbors.

Given that one of the numbers is a one, how many numbers (as a minimum) must there be?

  Submitted by McWorter    
Rating: 3.7500 (4 votes)
Solution: (Hide)
Let n be the number of numbers on the circle. Suppose the neighbor clockwise of 1 is a. Then, starting from 1 clockwise the first 8 numbers are

1, a, a-1, -1, -a, 1-a, 1, a.

Since the 7th and 8th numbers are 1 and a, this sequence of 6 numbers repeats itself.

If n is not a multiple of 6, then some two consecutive numbers in the sequence of 6 numbers other than the first two, (1,a), equals (1,a). Upon checking the five possiblilities we find that this is impossible. Hence n is a multiple of 6. We check the five cases.

(1,a)=(a,a-1) implies a=a-1 implies 0=-1; contradiction.

(1,a)=(a-1,-1) implies 1=a-1 and a=-1; implying 1=a-1=-2; contradiction.

(1,a)=(-1,-a) implies 1=-1; contradiction.

(1,a)=(-a,1-a) implies 1=-a and a=1-a, implying a=-1 and a=1/2; contradiction.

(1,a)=(1-a,1) implies 1=1-a and a=1, implying a=0 and a=1; contradiction.

Thus the least admissable value of n greater than 2000 is 2004, the smallest multiple of 6 greater than 2000.

(The number 1 on the circle is not sacred. It merely prohibits the "all zeros solution".)

Comments: ( You must be logged in to post comments.)
  Subject Author Date
AnswerK Sengupta2008-10-23 00:50:21
re(4): Just thinking...pcbouhid2005-06-05 21:42:05
re(3): Just thinking...McWorter2005-06-04 23:25:49
re(2): Just thinking...pcbouhid2005-06-04 22:08:04
re: Just thinking...McWorter2005-06-02 22:15:04
correcting my previous comment.pcbouhid2005-06-02 19:06:28
Just thinking...pcbouhid2005-06-02 19:03:52
re(8): What now ? - you're right again !!ajosin2005-06-02 13:50:10
re(7): What now ? - you're right again !!McWorter2005-06-01 21:57:52
re(6): What now ? - you're right again !!pcbouhid2005-06-01 16:40:41
re(5): What now ? - you're right again !!Charlie2005-06-01 15:20:09
re(4): What now ? - you're right again !!pcbouhid2005-06-01 14:56:04
re(3): What now ? - you're right again !!McWorter2005-06-01 04:32:33
re(2): What now ? - you're right again !!pcbouhid2005-06-01 00:27:17
re: What now ?McWorter2005-06-01 00:21:05
SolutionWhat now ?pcbouhid2005-05-31 20:08:22
McWorter, you're right !pcbouhid2005-05-31 19:46:39
re(3): Picky, picky! - I think I got it !! - better !!!McWorter2005-05-31 03:55:16
re(2): Picky, picky! - I think I got it !! - better !!!pcbouhid2005-05-30 22:09:16
re: Picky, picky!armando2005-05-30 21:44:45
Some Thoughtsre: Picky, picky! - I think I got it !!pcbouhid2005-05-30 21:22:56
Picky, picky!McWorter2005-05-30 18:51:20
Solutionsaurabh2005-05-27 19:38:31
re(3): quick answer - to BradBrad2005-05-27 18:09:10
re(2): quick answer - to Bradpcbouhid2005-05-27 17:44:38
re(2): quick answerBrad2005-05-27 17:41:59
re: quick answerBrad2005-05-27 17:38:30
re(3): forget my previous comment - the proof is wrongpcbouhid2005-05-27 16:36:19
re(2): quick answer - my proof is wrongpcbouhid2005-05-27 16:28:06
re: quick answerpcbouhid2005-05-27 16:24:05
quick answerarmando2005-05-27 14:01:03
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (15)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information