All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Numbers
Stupid number trick III (Posted on 2006-01-11) Difficulty: 3 of 5
Pick any whole number greater than 1.

1. Write down all of its proper divisors (including 1 and the number itself)
2. Add the digits of these divisors.
3. Use this sum to repeat steps 1 and 2 until your number does not change.

Must the process terminate?
At what number(s) can the process terminate at?
What numbers <1000 take the most steps to terminate?

See The Solution Submitted by Jer    
Rating: 4.0000 (3 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
re(2): Proof? | Comment 4 of 11 |
(In reply to re: Proof? by Bob Smith)

The root of the function that I have used to set an upper bound on f(n) i.e. 9 (1+Log(n) ) 2 Sqrt(n) = n at about 7444.

So instead of choosing n>10000 for my proof, I could have chosen any value greater than 7444.

Bob writes

"In fact, 48 is the largest value for which f(n) > n."

That this is a "fact" only follows because we can exclude all but a finite number of cases which can be computed.  A smaller bounding function is possible and would reduce the number of cases to be evaluated but since that number is already computable, there seems little point. 


  Posted by goFish on 2006-01-11 13:30:39
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (16)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information