All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > General > Cryptography
Lonhard (Posted on 2006-02-09) Difficulty: 3 of 5
You might try to tough out a solution without it, but I think you will find it most practical to start with a particular individual (usually a common sight, but not common in this paragraph.) Go to work on solving this, all you cunning cryptologists!

g.aimditmqnxmnneywuforoiiymaipscskfmwovsvtsmedoka

See The Solution Submitted by Mindrod    
Rating: 4.2500 (4 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
re: r: ? by Hugo | Comment 7 of 11 |
(In reply to r: ? by Hugo by Mindrod)

Nice Mindrod, you did it again.  I wonder if you can keep it up till the end.

So, this is what happened in the queue: The probelm's title is Lonhard.  To check the problem, I googled Lonhard and Google said: do you mean Leonhard.  I accepted that suggestion and came at Leonhard (Euler).  Mindrod still has that faulty keyboard that does typo's and I asked if the problem's title shouldn't be Leonhard.  About two minutes later I realised that I had solved halve of the problem, only by luck, not knowledge.  After it became public, I waited a couple of days.

All thi sto tell that the problem has to do with "e", 2.71 or something like that.  I'll look into this deeper later.

PS: read Mindrod's comments and admire how carefully she avoids using e.  I just challenged here to keep up the good work till the end.  That should keep her busy.


  Posted by Hugo on 2006-02-11 17:16:32
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (8)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information