All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Probability
Probability of All of a Set (Posted on 2003-03-13) Difficulty: 5 of 5
Prove that the probability of occurrence of all of a given set of events A(1) through A(n) is equal to the sum of the individual probabilities minus the sum of the probabilities of all pairs of events, A(i) OR A(j) plus the sum of all triples of events, A(i) OR A(j) OR A(k), ..., plus (-1)^(n-1) times the n-tuple A(i) OR ... OR A(n).

Prove for the specific cases of n = 3 and n = 10, and the general case.

See The Solution Submitted by Charlie    
Rating: 3.2500 (4 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
re(3): Done !!!! | Comment 8 of 11 |
(In reply to re(2): Done !!!! by Gamer)

Yes, you could say that +, in representing OR, adds only the parts that aren't already there, as A OR B includes A AND B but has the part of A not in B and the part of B not in A.

Looking at your algorithm it also looks as if you are going for A AND B AND C in terms of ORed pairs and triples, while what is sought is A OR B OR C in terms of ANDed pairs and triples, and to prove that the algorithm is true. In fact, the ORed compound given in terms of ANDed compounds is found in probability texts, but the other way around, I haven't seen.

Yes I did see the same post 3 times. I can only hypothesize it's the result of trying to split a long post into three parts, but getting the same part each time.
  Posted by Charlie on 2003-03-15 19:06:04

Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (2)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2017 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information