All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Shapes > Geometry
Incongruency (Posted on 2007-03-23) Difficulty: 4 of 5
It is easy to divide a square into four congruent isosceles triangles, just draw both diagonals. But can you divide a square into four incongruent isosceles triangles?

See The Solution Submitted by Brian Smith    
Rating: 4.0000 (1 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
Solution proof | Comment 3 of 4 |
(In reply to using geometer's sketchpad by Charlie)

Most of the construction is the same and the final picture is the same, but the proof is easier with a change to the final construction:

From the top left going clockwise, label the corners of the square A,B,C,D.

Draw a diagonal from A to C. The first isosceles triangle is in the upper right-- triangle ABC.

From A, lay off along the diagonal a length equal to one side of the square (call it length 1, for a unit square), and label the point E. The second isosceles triangle is AED.

The remaining length of the diagonal, EC, is sqrt(2) - 1. 

Bisect angle DAC, and label the intersection of the bisector with CD, F. And DAC is 45 degrees, with sine = 1/sqrt(2) and cosine = 1/sqrt(2). By half-angle formula tan(x/2) = (1 - cos x) / sin x. This comes out to sqrt(2) - 1.  By the symmetry of AEFD (which can be proved by making an additional point where the bisector cuts ED and showing congruent triangles), EF is also sqrt(2) -1. That shows that both triangles ECF and EFD are isosceles.

Edited on March 23, 2007, 3:10 pm
  Posted by Charlie on 2007-03-23 15:06:34

Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (10)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2017 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information