All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Paradoxes
Hell Hath No Fury ... (Posted on 2007-04-12) Difficulty: 3 of 5
Desperate David has undertaken a dangerous desert trek rather than marry either of his current girlfriends. So each girlfriend (unaware of the others actions) sabotaged his reserve water supply.

Debra added a quick-acting poison while Dana punctured the barrel, allowing all of the poisoned water to run away.

One week later David died from dehydration.

However:

  • When arrested Debra claimed she was innocent because even though she poisoned the water David did not drink any.
  • Dana claimed she was not guilty because puncturing the barrel had stopped David from dying sooner from the poison. Her action made him live longer.
  • They cannot be charged jointly since they acted independently

  • Who, if anyone, should be charged with what crime?

    See The Solution Submitted by Vernon Lewis    
    Rating: 3.0000 (2 votes)

    Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
    Solution No paradox | Comment 3 of 9 |
    David died from dehydration, so Dana is guilty of murder in the 1st degree. Dana didn't know about the poison, so her defense is faulty... and if she had known about it, she would have still been guilty, because of her disregard for human life.

    David might have died from poisoning (but didn't) so Debra is guilty of attempt to murder.


      Posted by Old Original Oskar! on 2007-04-12 12:16:32
    Please log in:
    Login:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Sign up! | Forgot password


    Search:
    Search body:
    Forums (0)
    Newest Problems
    Random Problem
    FAQ | About This Site
    Site Statistics
    New Comments (4)
    Unsolved Problems
    Top Rated Problems
    This month's top
    Most Commented On

    Chatterbox:
    Copyright © 2002 - 2017 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information