All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Numbers
Numeric Meld (Posted on 2012-01-06) Difficulty: 3 of 5

No Solution Yet Submitted by brianjn    
No Rating

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
re(2): computer solution Comment 3 of 3 |
(In reply to re: computer solution by Ady TZIDON)

"So:  - half the table was a priori redundant and Charlie's computer worked significant overtime."

It's true that in the first portion of my solution, where I ignored the "ascending magnitude" requirement, that the second part of the table was redundant; however, my for the final table it was not, as that took the "ascending" requirement into consideration.

But also, programming-wise, it was less time and energy to program the full solution straightforwardly, as it didn't matter that the computer run time would be 2 seconds instead of 1 (that being the order of magnitude of the run time). Programming reversals would have taken longer in human time.

Edit: actually it was more like a full second rather than half a second. The programming effort was not worth shaving a half second off the run time.

Edited on January 7, 2012, 10:20 am
  Posted by Charlie on 2012-01-07 10:16:33

Please log in:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password

Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (5)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Copyright © 2002 - 2018 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information