All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Riddles
Cheating by not cheating (Posted on 2012-05-30) Difficulty: 2 of 5
John Vignetti cheated on a test by not looking at the answers. If he had looked at the answers, then he would not have been cheating. How?

See The Solution Submitted by Math Man    
Rating: 5.0000 (1 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
re: Trained Monkey? | Comment 4 of 12 |
(In reply to Trained Monkey? by brianjn)

Randomly selecting answers may be cheating his own education, but, I agree, that the method itself would not be "cheating". 

Rather he had acquired a copy of the answers to the multiple choice/true-false test, had memorized them, and then supplied them.

Another possible test form could have been a "Jeopardy"-like test, where the answers are provided and one supplies the questions. It would require much more memorization, but the manner of cheating could have been the same as described for the multiple-choice/true-false exam.

In either method, looking at the answers in order to have not been cheating is not answered. This part of the puzzle is perhaps what provides the quandary.

Edited on May 31, 2012, 12:30 am
  Posted by Dej Mar on 2012-05-31 00:29:04

Please log in:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password

Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (5)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Copyright © 2002 - 2018 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information