All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Numbers > Sequences
Pigeons again (Posted on 2012-07-22) Difficulty: 3 of 5
If a n-term arithmetic progression is split into two sets, then at least one of the sets contains a 3-terms arithmetic progression .

For what minimal value of n the above statement is true?

Based upon a proof in V. K. Balakrishnan's Theory and Problems of Combinatorics, Schaum's Outline Series, McGraw-Hill, 1995, 1.110

No Solution Yet Submitted by Ady TZIDON    
Rating: 5.0000 (2 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
Some Thoughts I agree Comment 2 of 2 |

First, I assume that technically there could be a difference of 0.

Take the first 2 terms, {1,1} and place them in the first set, since we cannot fit any more without having a 3 term progression. Then put the second 2 in the second set, for the same reason. Then the 5th term must make the statement true whichever set it is placed in.

If the difference is greater than 0, the same principle applies. We may as well use the numbers from 1 with a common difference of 1. The first 2 terms go in the first set, the second 2 in the second set; the third 2 terms back in the first set and the 4th 2 terms back in the second set. Now the 9th term must complete a 3 term progression no matter where it is placed; either {1,5,9} or {3,6,9}.


  Posted by broll on 2012-07-23 00:48:23
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (2)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2017 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information