All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Logic
Errant Employee Extrication (Posted on 2013-11-19) Difficulty: 2 of 5
A theft has been committed on an establishment and the crime was committed by one of the four employees- Andy, Ben, Cal and Dan. Their statements are below. However, none of them can be depended upon to speak truthfully; each makes one true statement and one false statement, although in which order is unknown.
Andy
1. I do not trust Ben.
2. I am certainly not guilty.

Ben
1. Andy is guilty.
2. Dan did not do it.

Cal 
1. I did not know that the theft had occurred 
until I heard about it the day it was 
discovered.
2. Ben did not do it.

Dan  
1. Andy is innocent.
2. Cal did not do it.
Who committed the theft?

See The Solution Submitted by K Sengupta    
No Rating

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
Solution j'accuse (spoiler) Comment 1 of 1
If Andy did it, then both of Ben's statements are true.  Since one of the statements is known to be false, we can conclude that Andy did not do it.

Therefore, Dan's 1st statement is true.
Therefore, Dan's 2nd statement is false.
Therefore, Cal did it.

  Posted by Steve Herman on 2013-11-19 12:12:13
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (19)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information