All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Logic > Liars and Knights
Another trial (Posted on 2002-05-08) Difficulty: 2 of 5
Residents A, B and C, each of whom are either a Liar or a Knight are brought to stand trial for a crime only one of them commited.

Each person accused one of the other two, but the records do not show who exactly. As it turned out, A was the only Knight of the three.

Curiously enough, if each person switched their testimony, and accused the remaining suspect (not themselves, and not who they accused originally), then B would come out to be the only Knight.

Who was the real culprit in the case?

See The Solution Submitted by levik    
Rating: 3.2000 (10 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
since you can't accuse yourself... | Comment 2 of 7 |
Since no one accused themselves, we can tell that...

in the first situation, A is not the culprit

and in the second situation, B is not the culprit

So it must be C
  Posted by Happy on 2002-05-08 06:31:30
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (1)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (6)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information