All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Logic
Dinner Party (Posted on 2004-10-27) Difficulty: 3 of 5
Professor Levik was talking to a colleague who told him about a dinner party he had attended with his wife. The colleague told him the following things about the party:

1. There were four married couples present.
2. Each person had a unique hobby.
3. The eight people were seated around a dinner table with the host and hostess at either end and three people seated on either side.
4. Only one married couple were seated beside each other.
5. A man was seated on either side of the hostess.
6. A woman was seated on either side of the host.
7. The hostess likes to ride horses.
8. Donna collects stamps.
9. Carol and her husband were seated on the same side of the table.
10. The piano player was seated next to his brother-in-law.
11. The person who grows roses was seated next to the person who does needlepoint.
12. Frank was seated directly across from the person who builds model planes.
13. Harold is seated to the immediate right of the hostess.
14. George and Betty were seated directly across from each other.
15. Alice is married to Edward.
16. Donna's sister-in-law is seated directly across from Carol.
17. The piano player was seated next to the hostess.
18. The stamp collector's husband was seated across from the model plane builder.
19. Carol was seated immediately to the left of George.
20. Alice is married to the fisherman.
21. The person who does needlepoint was seated across from the actress.
22. The actress was seated immediately to the right of the host.
23. The fisherman was seated across from his sister.
24. Frank was seated next to Edward.

What was each person's hobby, and where did they sit?

See The Solution Submitted by Erik O.    
Rating: 4.2308 (26 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
re(2): PC check | Comment 4 of 53 |
(In reply to re: PC check by RandyOrton)

First - I know it said "married," that was my point =)  that today, a married couple isn't necessarily and man and a woman.

Second, please read my first paragraph of my second comment.  I give a non-offensive reason for why I realized all the couples were male-female.

And yes, I am sure you were just joking/being sarcastic, so I am not truly offended, though I don't think that was a very kind thing to say.

I have some other things to say, but then I would turn this thread into a debate and that's not what I meant initially =)  I just meant "hey, in this day and age we can't assume a married couple is a man and a woman =)" in a silly nit picky way.


  Posted by nikki on 2004-10-27 13:55:24
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (1)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (6)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information