It is well-known the solution to the problem of connecting nine dots, arranged in three rows of 3 dots, with
four straight lines, without lifting up the pencil from the paper where they are drawn, and without any tricks at all, like folding the paper, etc...
o o o
o o o
o o o
The question is: given the nine dots above, is it possible to connect them with
only 3 straight lines ? The restrictions are the same, that is, without lifting up the pencil from the paper where they are drawn, no tricks allowed, and if you retrace a line, you must count one more line.
Prove your answer!Note: this is a revisit to the problem
Nine Dots already posted in this site and you can use that drawing for reference.
(In reply to
another trick by Larry)
I cannot visualise what your 1/4 of the circum. and so pass thru 9 points.
That you went to the sphere is an excellent thought; I recall that it
is possible to force an increase in the inimum number of colours
required to shade a map by applying the map to the surface of a
torus.
And .. similarly I believe it is possible to cross every line segment
(below) only once, if one of the cells contains the inner ring of a
torus:
______________
| | | |
| | |
Problem in hand:
A straight line is the shortest distance between two points (Larry is following this thought).
I'm going to use the Earth as my point of reference:
If I start at the lowest left dot and proceed North along a line of
longitude to 0 deg N, I return thru the middle column of dots to 0 deg
S and continue by a third line of longitude so that I pass thru the
dots of the third column.
This uses 3 straight lines (as defined above) and because I cannot
prove an axiom, and I have fulfilled the task, there is nothing to
prove.
Else, if I am limited to a 2D coord system (flat), exploring Pascal, Desargue, etc, I see no plausible solution.
|
Posted by brianjn
on 2005-07-15 08:19:02 |