Presto the Mathematical Magician says, quite correctly, that ln(x), the natural logarithm (to the base e=2.718...) of x, is magically well-approximated by 2047(x^1/2048 - 1). Hence logarithms can be calculated with fair accuracy using a primitive calculator that only does square roots along with basic arithmetic.

What is behind Presto's magic?

By the same token, log(x), the common (base 10) logarithm of x, may be approximated by the similar formula K(x^1/2048 - 1) for a suitable value of K. For values of x between 1 and 10, explore the accuracy of this approximation, and that of similar formulas of the type K(x^1/N-1) where N=2ⁿ, under the assumption that a 10-digit calculator is being used to compute the repeated square roots. What values for K and n would you recommend when a 10-digit calculator is being used?

Hmmm, well, this reminds me of a well-known way to approximate the logarithm...  ahh, no, rather the...  well, why don't you think about it?  Have fun.

PS: With my plot program, it seems to work better with the prefactor 2048 for the natural logarithm. System dependent?

Posted by vswitchs on 2006-09-05 14:52:28