He called each of these a 'cubatom'. When properly put together they made a 'molecube'. This he said was a perfect cube.
He left me to puzzle over the scene. Before leaving however he did mention that all of the cubes were the right side up (for our purposes the bold numbers in the graphic are those on top.)
The cubes in the graphic are aligned as such:
/\ / \ |\ /| | \/ | \ / \/
So? What was I expected to deduce from this?
1 | 16 | 4 | 13 | |||||||||||||
14 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 12 | |||||
11 | 11 | 13 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 10 | 16 | 7 | 7 | 1 | |||||
2 | 15 | 3 | 14 | |||||||||||||
4 | 2 | 6 | 14 | |||||||||||||
15 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 13 | 9 | 15 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 1 | |||||
10 | 10 | 16 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 4 | 16 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 8 | |||||
3 | 1 | 9 | 13 | |||||||||||||
| See The Solution | Submitted by brianjn |
| Rating: 3.7500 (4 votes) |
re: Some possilbe deducements
|
 |
(In reply to Some possilbe deducements by Dej Mar)
Firstly, just one slightly moot point; I have defined each of these small cubes as a 'cubatom' and the whole structure as a 'molecube'.
That said, there is one numeral in these deducements which is highly significant. That is not to say that the other numbers are not; there is a relevance which is not to be dismissed.
Edited on May 2, 2007, 7:49 pm
| Posted by brianjn on 2007-05-02 19:47:51 |
