All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Logic > Weights and Scales
Circular Balance (Posted on 2008-03-20) Difficulty: 3 of 5
This represents a circular balance.
                       
         o           /|\           o
                      |
                      |					  
                      |       
 
A light circular disk is needle point mounted. It has a graduated scaled track "o" from which identical measuring pans may be suspended.

Suggest the minimum number of pans as well as the minimum weighings needed, and the strategy required to determine which one of 9 coins is in weight variance with the other 8 in a visually identical collection. You should also be able to determine if the variant coin is lighter or heavier than each of the others.

At the end of each weighing, the coins being weighed will be on the balance, and the balance will be in equilibrium.

For additional discussion:
The set of nine has 7 regular coins with one weighing lighter, and the other weighing heavier than the others.
How might the circular balance assist?
Does a disparate difference in weight of the lighter to the normal than the heavier to normal influence the procedure? [This thought was raised at review.]

See The Solution Submitted by brianjn    
Rating: 2.5000 (2 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
re: Additonal commentary after reading the official solution (Spoiler) | Comment 21 of 22 |
(In reply to Additonal commentary after reading the official solution (Spoiler) by Dej Mar)

It is indeed possible to accomplish this task with 3 pans and 2 weighings as Daj Mar has indicated, one just has to ensure that the group of 6 is weighed first.

<o:p></o:p>

Taking a step backward and readdressing a question posed by Gamer: Minimum?<o:p></o:p>
Charlie did address this with equal spacings; and he suggested “with the circular pan” when he certainly meant “circular disk.
Gamer also addressed this, taking to task minimum weighing as one point, and minimum pans on the other hand.  At that point there was wording which I had not sufficiently addressed.
[I did note however that while he (Gamer) had the solution in hand, equilibrium – original horizontal state of balance – had not been achieved.  Unfortunately that was not made clear; my assumption of equilibrium, yes faulty, that one’s action on a system should return one to the original state.]

<o:p></o:p>

Definition of Minimum.  I think that from your “definition”  a count of six is the minimal value (3 pans in each of two weighings) is required for surety before any action is taken?  If we get lucky ten the count is 3? 

I think I’ve addressed issues here; pity though that I did not have the availability of what the first paragraph addresses to add directly into the “official solution”.  Wonder if levik might however assist.
  Posted by brianjn on 2008-03-29 08:28:31
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (3)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information