My apologies,
it has been a long time since I formally engaged in the discipline, I recall the definition given us that a prime was only divisible by itself and unity, however I never recall it ever being impressed upon us that one was not in itself prime.
Oh, and yes, Dej Mar's comment drew my attention back to my text. It was some month ago when I wrote this that I had forgotten the implications of the first sentence. Hence Charlie's limit of 4 digits.
Edited on December 1, 2008, 9:57 pm
|
Posted by brianjn
on 2008-12-01 21:47:24 |