An "x-y" grid game that I know as "Find Merkle" [
M] requires a player [
H] to begin at (0,0) and zero in on a hidden co-ordinate location of the creature by nominating
one of the 4 cardinal directions and an integer distance. Upon failure to land on that location you are given just one cardinal direction towards that site.
Supposing "Merkle" is hiding at (5,5) and you are at (3,8) after your second play, which was either E3 or N8, you are told E or S, nothing more.
Let us allow two changes to this.
Firstly the player is told to move in
one of 8-point compass rose directions.
Secondly, upon failure to capture, "Merkle", having no knowledge of the hunter's location, randomly relocates to any of his immediately adjacent 8 locations except for one if already occupied by the hunter.
- This is exemplified if "H" has been told "SE" and has relocated to (6,5).
Oh, and the hunter only knows "Merkle's" location upon capture.
Given that the hunter is astute and multiple games are played, what is the most likely number of moves to capture "Merkle" within an NxN grid?
(In reply to
Clarify please. by Dej Mar)
"H is given 1 or 3 card directions in relation to the quadrant Merkel is in in relation to H."
I assume he means "1 OF 3", so yes, he could say "North", "Northeast", or "East".
As far as strategy, I was thinking of trying to "cut" the board in quarters by immediately travelling to (N/2, N/2) to see which quadrant Merkle is in, but cutting each quadrant into sub-quadrants seems to get me nowhere.
|
|
Posted by Dustin
on 2012-01-19 06:10:15 |
re: Clarify please.
