<o:p></o:p>
I <o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
The Essence <o:p></o:p>
There
are numerous flaws in the presentation,
I will address only four :
I.
The number 864, was neither calculated, (explained,
proven) nor used in deriving the
puzzle's answer. It is therefore redundant and should have been either replaced by a word
"numerous" or left to be evaluated
as part of the solving process.
<o:p></o:p>
II.
. You use the word "permuted
solutions" wrongly.
There are 2 distinct generic (not 2 permuted) solutions,
each creating 432 permuted
variations per each generic sample.
<o:p></o:p>
III
…".It quickly becomes obvious that X
can only be 1 or 2, and so by reflection then Y is whatever X is not." It is indeed very quickly, - it is
explicitly declared in the puzzle.<o:p></o:p>
IV.
The whole presentation is a perfect example
of 18 lines of words and numbers where 3
suffice, - a process that politicians practice (e.g. "at this particular
point in time" instead of "now"),- and mathematicians (especially logicians)
avoid. <o:p></o:p>
Adding just one simple sentence after "(11,11,22)" could constitute a formal proof :
Since the nine digits (w,e,b,p,a,n,d,i,t) sum
up to 44, while all ten distinct digits add up
to 45, then obviously digit 1 is not used and digit 2 is within the set
, QED.<o:p></o:p>
Erasing
the rest (brevity is the soul of wit) would definitely improve the
"official" solution.<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>