All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Logic
Tug-o-war (Posted on 2003-06-21) Difficulty: 3 of 5
There is a tug-o-war competition consisting of rounds upon round that all end in a draw meaning both sides end in equal strength. There are several people of exactly equal strength and are represented by the same symbol. (i.e. all * pull the same, but a * and a @ must be different) Each team is representeed by a series of symbols followed by a dashed line being the rope. On the other side of the rope is the team that was equally matched in strength. Here are some of those rounds:
*%-----$
$$$-------@%*%@
@-------!*
Again remembering that ll of the above are ties, and assume that position on the rope doesn't matter, who will win the following match?
!@!!@!-------%$*$

See The Solution Submitted by Jon    
Rating: 3.4545 (11 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
Solution *!$@# puzzle! | Comment 10 of 19 |
I LOVE tug-o-wars! They're so raw, yaknow. Oh! Anyway, here goes.

If we change everything to equations (with the plus sign understood), we get:
$ = *%
$$$=@@%%*
so $$ = %@@
@ = !*

Now we need to get both sides in terms that can be compared.

!!!!@@----%*$$

The right side is the same strength as $$$
($$+(%*)), and we can then substitute the $$$ equivalent on the right:

!!!!@@----%%@@*
which then can be simplified
!!!!----%%*

Well, this doesn't seem to be going anywhere. EXCEPT, maybe we can get something more workable if we visit the original examples.

$$ = %@@, and $ = %*, so
%%** = %@@
%** = @@
%** = !*!*
and so % = !!

getting back to the 'pitted' battle (I'm thinking chocolate pudding in there, but that's a personal issue =0),

(!!)(!!)----%%*
substitute on the left
%%----%%*
And the weiner is: Team Righty!
Note: I actually came up with the % = !! by stopping at our stopping point above, taking another approach, and ending up with
!!!!!!----%%%*, but once I got there and saw the equivalency, I decided it was neater to prove it "mathematically."

  Posted by Jim C on 2003-07-03 07:05:50
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (1)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (6)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information