All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Logic
At the Olympic Games (1) (Posted on 2003-10-07) Difficulty: 3 of 5
Three reporters were discussing the hockey results. The TV reporter said "Either Brazil won gold, or Chile won silver, but not both." The radio reporter similarly started to say "Either Argentine won silver, or Chile won …", but a sudden noise cut him off.

The press reporter, who was lucky enough to hear the complete sentence, could reason out the final order of the three countries. What was it?

See The Solution Submitted by Federico Kereki    
Rating: 3.2000 (10 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
Solution solution | Comment 2 of 21 |
The second statement must be one of the two following:
(2a) "Either Argentine won silver, or Chile won bronze" --or--
(2b) "Either Argentine won silver, or Chile won gold"

There are only 6 possibilities:
A B C (ruled out by statement 1 & 2b)
A C B (ruled out by statement 2a & 2b)
B A C (ruled out by statement 2a)
B C A (ruled out by statement 1, 2a, 2b)
C A B (ruled out by statement 1, 2b)
C B A (ruled out by statement 1, 2a)

If it had been 2a, then there is no solution (all are ruled out), so it must have been 2b.

Which means:
Brazil won Gold
Argentine won Silver, and
Chile won Bronze

Okay... I was hurried through this... I hope further analysis supports mine.
  Posted by SilverKnight on 2003-10-07 11:48:34
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (1)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (6)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information