All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Probability
Not The Weakest Link (Posted on 2020-12-28) Difficulty: 4 of 5
This game of chance for one person is loosely based on one round of the TV game show The Weakest Link. For comparison, each unit is, again loosely, based on $1000 on the show. This game of chance is done for only one round and only one person is playing.

The rules of the game of chance:

You roll a die 27 times, or until you win a 128-unit prize. Each roll is scored as a Loss if the die comes up 1 or 2; a Win otherwise.

The game starts off at stage 0. A Win advances to the next stage; a Loss reverts the stage to 0.

Before any roll, at your discretion you may say "Bank", which results in your winnings being increased by an amount equal to 2^(s-1) where s is the stage number, except nothing in stage 0: 1 unit if in stage 1, through 128 units in stage 8, but when you Bank, the stage reverts to 0 again.

If you get a Win in stage 8, not only is 128 added to any previous winnings, but the game ends even if 27 rolls have not yet taken place. Getting a stage-8 Win and banking are the only two ways of adding to your winnings.

If you get a Win on the 27th (last) roll you keep the value for that stage (an automatic bank after your successful roll).

Is it ever advantageous to Bank?

What's the expected value of the game, given optimal strategy?

  Submitted by Charlie    
Rating: 5.0000 (1 votes)
Solution: (Hide)
Based on the computer-generated results, when played optimally, which is to avoid banking, your expectation at the beginning of the game is 38.1733 units.

However, simulations show that the probability of getting 8 Wins in a row during a play of 27 rolls is only a small fraction above 27%. That would seem to indicate that the expected value should be only about 128*.271 or 34.7. How does it get higher? I puzzled over this for a while and realized that if you haven't reached stage 8 when you get to the 27th roll, the program credits you with the amount for the stage in which you were correct, as if there is an automatic bank after the completion of the 27th roll. It made me add the rule stating that fact.

If it reaches the point of the $128,000 question, if you bank, you've got $64,000; if you don't bank, you have a 2/3 probability of getting $128,000 added to your winnings and 1/3 chance of getting nothing except a new beginning (with a reduced number of remaining questions). It seems clear it's worth avoiding banking.

Each column below represents a stage from 1 through 8; each row is a successive roll of the die.

   38.1733   \\40.1451   43.0596   47.3672   53.8758   63.7705   78.6033  100.8392 
   36.8392   38.8403   \\41.7981   46.1697   52.6313   62.3941   77.2361   99.4854 
   35.4854   37.5162   40.5178   \\44.9544   51.5119   61.2042   75.8485   98.1115 
   34.1115   36.1724   39.2185   43.7210   \\50.3758   60.2121   74.7505   96.7170 
   32.7170   34.8087   37.9000   42.4693   49.2229   \\59.2052   73.9596   95.7673 
   31.3018   33.4247   36.5621   41.1991   48.0530   58.1835   \\73.1569   95.2885 
   29.8655   32.0200   35.2042   39.9104   46.8659   57.1467   72.3425   \\94.8027 
   28.4080   30.5943   33.8259   38.6024   45.6616   56.0949   71.5161   94.3097 
   26.9291   29.1474   32.4269   37.2743   44.4390   55.0279   70.6778   93.8096 
   25.4288   27.6793   31.0068   35.9259   43.1971   53.9441   69.8275   93.3023 
   23.9069   26.1897   29.5655   34.5567   41.9354   52.8423   68.9627   92.7878 
   22.3633   24.6786   28.1029   33.1666   40.6534   51.7215   68.0818   92.2624 
   20.7873   23.1513   26.6243   31.7607   39.3562   50.5865   67.1886   91.7290 
   19.1869   21.5875   25.1335   30.3430   38.0476   49.4409   66.2863   91.1894 
   17.5683   19.9962   23.5971   28.9162   36.7304   48.2872   65.3772   90.6453 
   15.9359   18.3844   22.0264   27.4277   35.4063   47.1276   64.4629   90.0978 
   14.2933   16.7572   20.4300   25.8930   33.9949   45.9628   63.5447   89.5477 
   12.6430   15.1185   18.8144   24.3236   32.5180   44.6709   62.6227   88.9956 
   10.9868   13.4710   17.1843   22.7281   30.9919   43.2835   61.5129   88.4407 
    9.3221   11.8192   15.5455   21.1154   29.4312   41.8269   60.2643   87.6083 
    6.8249   10.5706   14.3164   19.9058   28.2606   40.7343   59.3278   86.9840 
    4.9520    7.7613   13.3800   18.9986   27.3827   39.9150   58.6255   86.5158 
    3.5473    5.6543    9.8683   18.2963   26.7243   39.3004   58.0988   86.1646 
    2.4938    4.0741    7.2346   13.5556   26.1975   38.8395   57.7037   85.9012 
    1.7037    2.8889    5.2593   10.0000   19.4815   38.4444   57.4074   85.7037 
    1.1111    2.0000    3.7778    7.3333   14.4444   28.6667   57.1111   85.5556 
    0.6667    1.3333    2.6667    5.3333   10.6667   21.3333   42.6667   85.3333 

The optimization program avoids banking (would be a 1) in all rolls in all possible stages. (The impossible stages are shown to the right of the backslashes; they represent rolls in a more advanced stage than is possible with the stage on the first roll being 1.)

sayBank =
     0     \\0     0     0     0     0     0     1
     0     0     \\0     0     0     0     0     1
     0     0     0     \\0     0     0     0     1
     0     0     0     0     \\0     0     0     1
     0     0     0     0     0     \\0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     \\0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     \\0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
     0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0

Calculations were done from high to low in both roll number and stage to allow recursing to previously calculate values:

p0=2/3;
sayBank=zeros(27,8);
for i=1:8
    winnings(28,i)=0;
end
for i=1:28
    winnings(i,9)=128;
end
for q=27:-1:1
    ppot=128; pot=64;
    for lvl=8:-1:1
        bval=pot+winnings(q+1,1);  % value of banking
        if q==27
            nbval=p0*ppot;         % value of not banking
        else
            nbval=p0*(winnings(q+1,lvl+1))+(1-p0)*winnings(q+1,1);
        end
        if bval>nbval              % which is the better choice?
            sayBank(q,lvl)=1;
            winnings(q,lvl)=bval;
        else
            winnings(q,lvl)=nbval;
        end
        ppot=ppot/2; pot=ppot/2;
        if pot<1 
            pot=0;
        end
    end
end
clc
format short
winnings
sayBank

				

Comments: ( You must be logged in to post comments.)
  Subject Author Date
Puzzle AnswerK Sengupta2023-11-23 03:08:42
re: EducationLisa2023-11-22 17:47:00
EducationDCohen012022-03-05 02:51:20
MarketingEngen2021-11-06 04:02:55
No SubjectJayden Paine2021-07-01 04:10:16
correctionSteven Lord2020-12-31 15:40:38
The "official" solution is available for commentCharlie2020-12-31 07:36:41
solution via simulationSteven Lord2020-12-28 23:09:57
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (1)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (6)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information