All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Probability
At the World Series (Posted on 2004-04-01) Difficulty: 3 of 5
The (baseball) World Series consists of seven games, and the first team to win four games wins the title. The first two games are played at home; the next three away, and the last two at home again -- though of course not all games might be played. (As happened this year when the Marlins beat the Yankees 4-2... GRRR!!)

The probabilities involved were mentioned in World Series.

Assuming the teams have the same chance of winning each game, what is the most equitable way to plan the games, so as to minimize the expected difference between home and away games? And, in that case, what are the expected numbers of home games, of away games, and of total games?

  Submitted by Federico Kereki    
Rating: 3.2000 (5 votes)
Solution: (Hide)
To answer these questions, we'll need a basic fact: the odds of a team winning 4 to N are (1/2)(3+N) * C(4+N,N). Thus, the odds of a 4-0 result are 1/8; 4-1, 1/4; 4-2, 5/16; and 4-3, 5/16. (This results also appear in the solution to the original "World Series" problem.)

The expected number of games, however played, is 4*1/8 + 5*1/4 + 6*5/16 + 7*5/16 = 93/16, just a little under 6.

The odds of the first 4 matches being played is 1, for they will always have to be played. The odds for needing a 5th game are 1-1/8=7/8. The odds for a 6th game are 7/8-1/4=5/8. Finally, the odds for a 7th game are 5/8-5/16=5/16.

The most equitable way to play the games is: split the first 4 games 2-2, and give a team the 5th match, and the 6th and 7th to the other: this gives the first team 2+7/8 games, and the second 2+15/16 games -- just a 1/16 game difference.

If you want to minimize travel, the optimum solution is the one actually used: start with two home matches, then three away matches, and finish with two home matches, but there are eleven more possibilities.

Comments: ( You must be logged in to post comments.)
  Subject Author Date
re(3): More importantly...fwaff2004-04-08 05:45:01
re(2): More importantly...Penny2004-04-05 19:02:35
re: More importantly...Federico Kereki2004-04-05 12:55:21
QuestionMore importantly...fwaff2004-04-05 09:10:13
Some ThoughtsMost equitablePenny2004-04-01 13:41:57
SolutionSolutione.g.2004-04-01 09:55:32
SolutionsolutionCharlie2004-04-01 09:39:31
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (3)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information