All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Logic
The White Knight who couldn't quite remember (Posted on 2004-04-06) Difficulty: 4 of 5
The White Knight was recounting the story of one of the trials he had recently attended:

“Ah yes, it was a fine trial. Let’s see if I can remember it… If I recall there were three defendants. Each of them made one statement accusing one of the others, I think, but I’m afraid I can’t remember who accused whom. Can you work out who was guilty?”

“Of course not!” you reply. “You haven’t told me anything yet! Could you at least tell me who lied and who told the truth?”

“Hmmm... Interesting that you should ask that. When I was describing the trial to the Red King he asked me the same question. When I told him the answer, he worked it out. Unfortunately I’ve now quite forgotten what I said.”

“Well, I guess it’s hopeless for me then…” you sigh.

“Interesting that you should say that, too. When I was describing the trial to Humpty Dumpty he asked me the same question, and when I told him I had forgotten what I told the Red King, he too claimed to be at a loss. But then he asked me another question, I can't quite remember what, but when I told him the answer he was able to solve it. I think he either asked me whether two consecutive statements were true, or whether two consecutive statements were false. Unfortunately I can neither remember which one he asked, nor what I answered. I think I’ve given you quite enough information now though, so tell me: who was guilty?”

    Adapted from Raymond Smullyan's Alice in Puzzleland

  Submitted by Sam    
Rating: 4.3846 (13 votes)
Solution: (Hide)
The Red King managed to solve the puzzle just by being told who lied and who told the truth.

Remembering that each defendent accused someone else, we know that the guilty person can't have been telling the truth (or he'd have to accuse himself). Therefore, we are left with three possibilities:

-One person lied.
Since the guilty person must have lied, the one liar would have to be the guilty person.
-Two people lied.
One person would have told the truth, but we don't know who that person would have accused. The two liars would be indistinguishable. So if two people lied, the Red King would not have been able to work out who was guilty.
-Everyone lied.
Again, if everyone lied there would have been no way for the the Red King to work out who was guilty.

So, knowing that the Red Kind solved the puzzle, we know that exactly one person lied.

Knowing this, we know that had Humpty Dumpty asked if two consecutive people had told lies the answer would always have been no, and Humpty Dumpty would not have been able to work out the solution. Since we know he was able to work it out, he must have asked if two consecutive statements were the truth.

Suppose the answer was 'Yes'. This would mean that either the first person or the last person could have told a lie. Humpty Dumpty would therefore not have been able to work out who the liar was, and thus who was guilty, if this were the case.

So the answer must have been no, as Humpty Dumpty successfully worked it out. Since it was not the case that two consecutive statements were true, the second one must have been a lie. Since the liar was the guilty party, the second defendent was guilty.

Comments: ( You must be logged in to post comments.)
  Subject Author Date
Puzzle ThoughtsK Sengupta2024-02-27 09:16:53
re: Faulty logic? - Never mind...Erik2004-06-04 19:12:26
QuestionFaulty logic?Erik2004-06-04 19:00:23
SolutionSolutionGalendir2004-04-19 04:51:32
Possible SolutionJoshua2004-04-17 03:17:02
re(6): Through the looking glass......Sam2004-04-08 00:48:54
re(5): Through the looking glass......Benjamin J. Ladd2004-04-07 21:38:03
re(4): Through the looking glass......Penny2004-04-07 20:09:46
re(3): Through the looking glass......Benjamin J. Ladd2004-04-07 19:18:14
Solutionre(3): Through the looking glass......Tristan2004-04-07 15:35:46
Solutionstan2004-04-07 12:09:58
re(2): Through the looking glass......Penny2004-04-07 04:39:46
Solutionre: Through the looking glass......Benjamin J. Ladd2004-04-06 21:45:51
SolutionThrough the looking glass......Penny2004-04-06 16:59:12
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (3)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information