All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Shapes > Geometry
'Perfect Oval' (Posted on 2006-11-18) Difficulty: 3 of 5
A well-meaning senior citizen once erroneously contended that a "perfect oval" could only be constructed with a straight edge and a pair of compasses.

The theoretical construction that he described so very closely approximates the ellipse given by the equation: (x^2)/16 + (y^2)/9 = 1.

Required:
1. Emulate such a construction
2. Suggest the difference in area of these two entities if this construction and an ellipse representing the above equation are drawn at the same scale (let them share a common major radial length).

To my knowledge, oval and ellipse refer to the same thing, ellipse being the 'technical' term.

  Submitted by brianjn    
Rating: 4.0000 (1 votes)
Solution: (Hide)
Before I describe my construction, I must commend the more sophicated
method used by Bractals; the error is actually less than this construction,
in fact, considerably less.
I have noted the similarities of the two methods below

Construction
Apologies, but with a 'little' Gestalt closure, please allow this model
to be an ellipse ... and then, with my description below, this will make sense.

                        Y'
           				                             
                      --|--						
                 G      M      H
                        |
             /          |          \
         X'  -------A---o---B-------  X"
             \          |          /
                        |						
                 I      N      J
                      --|--
						
                        Y"

1. Draw a horizontal line with the straight edge,X'-X".
2. Construct a circle (radius X) centred at A.
3. Construct a second circle (same radius) whose centre, B, 
   is at the intersection of the the circumference of the  
   circle whose centre is A and line X'-X".
4. Reset the compass radius to 2 * X (the diameter of one of 
   the circles; the only reason for the straight edge).
5. With this radius draw 2 arcs, one above and one below the 
   two linked circles and centred at M and N. 
Areas In comparing the outlines of these two entities, I found it easiest to look at the x-axis (Major radius of the ellipse) as having 24 divisions.
Drawing this up in a CAD program the lowest integers available to me were R = 8 for my shorter compass radius, with Mj = 12 for the Major and Mr = 9 for the Minor radii of the 4:3 ellipse. Construction There are:- 2 sectors: GIA and HJB, each of area (ΠR^2)/3 and 2 sectors: GHN and IJM, each of area (Π(2*R)^2)/6 which has a superfluous overlap,MBNA; area of 2* (R*R√3/4) or (R*R√3/2) yielding an enclosure of Area = 2*((Π R^2)/3 + (Π (2*R)^2)/6) - (R*R√3/2) = 2Π((R^2)/3 + (4R^2)/6)- (R*R√3/2) = 2Π(2(R^2)/6 + (4R^2)/6)- (R*R√3/2) = 2ΠR^2 - (R*R√3/2) = 2Π8*8 - (8*8√3/2) = 346.70 Ellipse Area = Π Mj * Mr = 108Π = 339.29 Comparison: The construction actually contains the ellipse within two very fine 'crescents'; an error of about 2.14%. The ellipse is 97.86% in area of the constructed model.
Note: Values are rounded to 2 dec. pl.

 Bractal's Solution:
His diagram would look rather like this, but with arcs drawn in.
                        Y'
           				                             
                      --B--						
                        |  M    E
                        |
                        |          \
         X'  -----------o---C------A  X"
                        |          /
                        |						
                        D       
                      --|--
						
                        Y"
Points E, C and D are collinear.

His centre C corresponds in function to my centre B in that we both 
use that location to construct small circles or arcs. His centre D provides the same function for my centre N to create an
arc of larger radius than the smaller circle. My construction really only requires the straight edge so that you have
a place of reference upon which to locate two circles, and then for
'accuracy', gauge the diameter for the larger arcs. Note that with the method I have listed, I could have chosen to demand
construction by a pair of compasses only. Both methods have their merits, Bractals, well done.

Comments: ( You must be logged in to post comments.)
  Subject Author Date
re(2): Notes re solutionbrianjn2006-11-29 19:15:01
re: Notes re solutionBractals2006-11-29 05:36:31
Notes re solutionbrianjn2006-11-29 01:17:04
re: Solutionbrianjn2006-11-19 19:16:20
SolutionSolutionBractals2006-11-18 17:28:31
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (1)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (6)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information