All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Logic
At the Olympic Games (1) (Posted on 2003-10-07) Difficulty: 3 of 5
Three reporters were discussing the hockey results. The TV reporter said "Either Brazil won gold, or Chile won silver, but not both." The radio reporter similarly started to say "Either Argentine won silver, or Chile won …", but a sudden noise cut him off.

The press reporter, who was lucky enough to hear the complete sentence, could reason out the final order of the three countries. What was it?

See The Solution Submitted by Federico Kereki    
Rating: 3.2000 (10 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
re: Of course one thing is assumed. | Comment 16 of 21 |
(In reply to Of course one thing is assumed. by Charlie)

Well, the question does state that the reporter IS able to deduce the order. The only assumption that I make about that is to assume that he did actually deduce it correctly (even if he had to make assumptions like the one you are mentioning).

This is why, in my opinion, restricting it to those three countries is not necessarily an assumption. The question should maybe state whether the reporter got it right or not...
  Posted by ratsnstuff on 2003-10-09 04:08:57

Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (13)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information