All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Logic
At the Olympic Games (5) (Posted on 2004-08-30) Difficulty: 3 of 5
It was logical that four asian countries (Japan, Korea, Laos and Malaysia) should be the judo finalists, but I couldn’t learn the relative standings.

A reporter told me “Laos won silver, and/or Malaysia won bronze.” Other reporter added “Japan won gold, and/or Korea won bronze.” A third one added “Laos won gold, and/or Japan won silver.”

I couldn’t make heads or tails out of this, until I remembered that in judo, two bronze medals are awarded. Which were the standings?

See The Solution Submitted by Federico Kereki    
Rating: 2.6000 (10 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
Solution What up with this? | Comment 5 of 21 |

I just wanted to ask a quick question. If we as a group assume that

1) Loas 2) Japan 3) Malaysia 3) Korea

as the infallible answer than we are wrong. Why can't the first two statements be the correct ones?

There might be the answer from just the first two statements.

1) Japan 2) Loas 3) Korea 3) Malaysia

The correct answer might be the first two propositions only. I can't see any difference between this answer and the other variant. Whats up with that?

I'm going with

"Laos won silver and Malaysia won bronze"

+

"Japan won gold, and Korea won bronze"

 


  Posted by Ulysses on 2004-08-30 22:32:48
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (24)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information