All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Numbers > Sequences
2nd difference sequence (Posted on 2005-10-22) Difficulty: 3 of 5
While working with a non-zero sequence recently, I noticed that when I found the second difference of the sequence, the result was identical to the original sequence. Specifically, the first term of the 2nd difference sequence was the same as the first term of the original sequence. And so on.
What is the limit (as n goes to infinity), of the ratio of the n-th term to the previous term?

Part 2
Another sequence has the property that each term of the 2nd difference sequence is equal to the corresponding term of the original sequence multiplied by "k", where k is a positive real number, not necessarily an integer.
For the original sequence, what is the ratio (in the limit) of the n-th term to the previous term?

Definition of 1st difference sequence:
For sequence: a(1), a(2), ..., a(n),...
1st difference is: a(2)-a(1), a(3)-a(2), ... a(n+1)-a(n),...

See The Solution Submitted by Larry    
Rating: 3.5000 (2 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
Solution Independent solution Comment 11 of 11 |

The most obvious thing to try first is to try a little algebra.


Seq.   1st dif.    2nd dif
f(n) f(n+1)-f(n) f(n+2)-2f(n+1)+f(n)

So for part 1:
f(n) = f(n+2) - 2f(n+1) + f(n)
f(n+2) = 2f(n+1)

Therefore, each term is double the previous one, at least for N>2.

For part 2:
f(n) = kf(n+2) - 2kf(n+1) + kf(n)
(k-1)f(n) - 2kf(n+1) + kf(n+2) = 0
k-1 - 2kf(n+1)/f(n) + kf(n+2)/f(n) = 0  OR  f(n) = 0

Assuming that the ratio has a limit, f(n+1)/f(n) approaches f(n+2)/f(n+1) as n approaches infinity.

k-1 - 2k ( f(n+1)/f(n) ) + k ( f(n+1)/f(n) )^2 = 0
f(n+1)/f(n) = [ 2k +/- sqrt( 4k^2 - 4k^2 + 4k ) ] / 2k
f(n+1)/f(n) = 1 +/- sqrt(k)/k

So there are 3 final answers for the limit of the ratio:
0
1 + sqrt(k)/k
1 - sqrt(k)/k

I'm not yet sure of the origin of two roots, but I don't yet have a reason to think either of them is an extraneous root.

I may have made mistakes.  Please correct me if you catch any.

Edit: I believe that I've made an error somewhere, since these ratios give 1/k rather than k.  I don't have the time or will to make corrections now though.

Edited on October 26, 2005, 2:05 am

Edited on October 26, 2005, 2:15 am
  Posted by Tristan on 2005-10-25 19:14:10

Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (1)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (11)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information