All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Science
Snookered! Part II (Posted on 2007-02-08) Difficulty: 3 of 5
In “Snookered” there was a realistic value for friction of the rolling cue ball, but the bounce off the rail of the billiards table was “perfect”. A more realistic value for the “coefficient of restitution” of such a bounce is 0.7 (perfect = 1.0). For that case, how much harder would you need to hit the cue ball (compared to Part I) in order to again just make the shot? And where would you place the ball this time?

  Submitted by Kenny M    
No Rating
Solution: (Hide)
When the coefficient of restitution (COR) is <> 1, then the angle of reflection (Ar) is not equal to the angle of incidence (Ai). Instead, with COR = 0.7:

Tan (Ai) = COR * tan(Ar) .

This I because only the velocity directly in line to the impact is reduced by the COR; the velocity perpendicular to the rail is not affected. Using the notation in Part I:

x1/2s = 0.7 * x2/8s & (again) x1 + x2 = 2s leads to Ai = 8.472 deg, Ar = 12.011 deg, x1=.29787s and x2=1.70213s

The cue ball starting spot is 4 * x1 + x2 = 2.8936 s = 2.8936 rail sights from the target pocket.

From here, realizing that path length is slightly different from part I, and also taking into account that only the perpendicular portion of the cue ball velocity is reduced by the factor of 0.7 when it bounces off the foot rail, an initial speed of 4.8929 * s^.5 is required, or about 22% faster than for Part I.

Comments: ( You must be logged in to post comments.)
  Subject Author Date
Carebrianjn2007-02-11 06:47:33
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (1)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (17)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information