All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Logic
Jury selection (Posted on 2003-03-13) Difficulty: 2 of 5
In the jury selection phase of a murder trial, one of the attorneys asked a prospective juror:

"Would you be able to enter a guilty verdict if you knew that such a verdict would condemn the defendant to death?"

The person replied: "No. I beleive that human life is the most important thing, and must be preserved above all else."

The lawyer asked: "So you will hold to this even though it may keep you off this jury?"

"Yes," the person replied.

How did the lawyer know he was lying?

See The Solution Submitted by levik    
Rating: 2.5000 (8 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
Solution Since this is a logic puzzle--not the real world... | Comment 3 of 18 |
In the real world, people are inconsistent and often don't see the full consequences of their actions, it's possible the juror is not lying.

However this is a logic puzzle, where people know logic and are consistent. If the juror felt that human life was more important than anything, he would know it was more important than avoiding lying or avoiding jury service or rendering a correct verdict, and so would rather stay on the jury to prevent the death of the defendant.
  Posted by Charlie on 2003-03-13 09:29:34
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (4)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2017 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information