This is one of two new sequences but the second would give this one away. It starts at 2.

55, 4, 28, 28, 4, 19, 19, 2, 19, 19, 4, 19, 19, 13, 28, 28, 11, 46, 199, ...

ps. It isn't in the OEIS (but it probably should be.)

(In reply to re: Poly thoughts? by broll)

While the sequence you offer has more credibility than my musings there would seem to be some difficulty in trying to marry it with numbers like 55, 46 and 199 contained in the sequence that we are given.

Posted by brianjn on 2012-12-09 18:16:21