* * * * *
* * * * 4 7 7 * * * *
* * * 5 4 4 8 3 3 4 6 3 * * *
* * 1 4 5 1 1 1 4 5 1 7 1 3 5 * *
* * 4 9 4 9 6 7 5 5 5 8 7 6 6 8 5 * *
* 3 7 2 9 8 3 5 6 7 3 9 1 8 7 5 8 5 *
* * 1 4 7 8 4 2 9 2 7 1 1 8 2 2 7 6 3 * *
* 7 2 1 8 5 5 3 1 1 3 1 3 3 4 2 8 6 1 3 *
* 4 2 6 7 2 5 2 4 2 2 5 4 3 2 8 1 7 7 3 *
* * 4 1 6 5 1 1 1 9 1 4 3 4 4 3 1 9 8 2 7 * *
* 4 3 5 2 3 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 3 5 1 1 3 5 5 3 7 *
* 2 7 1 5 1 1 3 1 5 3(3)2 4 2 3 7 7 5 4 2 7 *
* 2 5 2 2 6 1 2 4 4 6 3 4 1 2 1 2 6 5 1 8 8 *
* * 4 3 7 5 1 9 3 4 4 5 2 9 4 1 9 5 7 4 8 * *
* 4 1 6 7 8 3 4 3 4 1 3 1 2 3 2 3 6 2 4 *
* 7 3 2 6 1 5 3 9 2 3 2 1 5 7 5 8 9 5 4 *
* * 1 6 7 3 4 8 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 8 9 4 1 * *
* 2 5 4 7 8 7 5 6 1 3 5 7 8 7 2 9 3 *
* * 6 5 6 4 6 7 2 5 2 2 6 3 4 7 4 * *
* * 2 3 1 2 3 3 3 2 1 3 2 1 1 * *
* * * 7 4 4 5 7 3 4 4 7 * * *
* * * * 3 3 4 * * * *
* * * * *
Starting from the central cell of this maze (there's a (3) in it), the challenge is to find a path that leads you off the maze, and to a "star" (*).
The number at each cell shows how many steps, in a straight line, you must take. You can travel horizontally, vertically, or diagonally, up or down, left or right.
(In reply to
ARE YOU GLAD, CHARLIE??? by pcbouhid)
Not long ago we had a discussion concerning using high-speed technology
in solution approaches. Did Charlie not completely warn the reader that
he has a solution and the solution involves programming? Did he not
take the time to discuss the nature of his algorithm? Is his solution
less legitimate because he uses an algorithmic approach? Were the
others who answered before him chastised for giving "early" answers?
And can we not read what he says and respond to improve the his
approach (as GoFish's brute response)?
I, for one, look forward to the view that Charlie and others bring to
each of these problems. And I have no problem ignoring his or anyone's
solutions when I am not ready.
|
|
Posted by owl
on 2005-09-26 13:55:55 |
re: ARE YOU GLAD, CHARLIE???
