All about flooble | fun stuff | Get a free chatterbox | Free JavaScript | Avatars    
perplexus dot info

Home > Just Math
Arithmetic Integers (Posted on 2006-02-06) Difficulty: 3 of 5
A series of 3 numbers B(1),B(2) and B(3) are defined to be in Arithmetic Progression if B(3) - B(2) = B(2) - B(1).

Without referring to Fermat's Last Theorem, prove that it is not feasible to determine three positive integers in Arithmetic Progression with the nineteenth power of the largest integer being equal to the sum of nineteenth powers of the remaining integers.

See The Solution Submitted by K Sengupta    
Rating: 2.7500 (4 votes)

Comments: ( Back to comment list | You must be logged in to post comments.)
Solution Proof, I think | Comment 1 of 2

Assume there exist positive integers in arithmetic progression a, a+d and a+2d such that

a^19 + (a+d)^19 = (a + 2d)^19

Then, a^19 + a^19 = a^19 (mod d), so a = 0 mod d.... (1)

And, 0 + d^19 = 524288 d^19 (mod a), so d = 0 and/or 524288 = 1 (mod a) ...(2)

If d | a, and a | d then a = d. but a^19 + (a+a)^19 = 524288 a^19 which is not equal to (a+2a)^19=1162261467 a^19.

If 524288 = 1 (mod a) then a | 524287 but 524287 is prime, so a = 524287.

But d | a (by (1)) so d = 524287.

But then a = d which has just been proved impossible.

By exhausting these possibilities we have shown the assumption is false.


  Posted by goFish on 2006-02-06 16:01:36
Please log in:
Login:
Password:
Remember me:
Sign up! | Forgot password


Search:
Search body:
Forums (0)
Newest Problems
Random Problem
FAQ | About This Site
Site Statistics
New Comments (3)
Unsolved Problems
Top Rated Problems
This month's top
Most Commented On

Chatterbox:
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 by Animus Pactum Consulting. All rights reserved. Privacy Information