(In reply to
re: A Computer Assisted look ??? by Charlie)
Many thanks Charlie. I did fiddle with a couple of data types but my reference, not extensive, seemed a bit short on control string advice; this seemed to work.
As it was int every so often reverted to -ve values which I realised was due to overflow of 32k.
Again, thanks.
A change of data type made quite a difference, but the program cut out the first 19 on Charlie's list. That is not surprising because the highest values for x and y are in an order far beyond what my program is seeking. Extending the high counter range of x and y is telling on the time to find the first result!!! Hope I don't add too much to global warming!
Edited on October 2, 2006, 12:31 am
|
|
Posted by brianjn
on 2006-10-01 18:55:23 |
re(2): A Computer Assisted look ???
