(In reply to
re(5): Solution? by Richard)
I'll try to state my original idea a little more clearly, and add that x = -4 also should work. If you set f_1(x) equal to 2x, you get:
2x = sqrt(x^2 + 48)
4x^2 = x^2 + 48
3x^2 = 48
x^2 = 16
x = 4 or -4
Plugging x = 4 back into the equation for f_1(x):
f_1(x) = sqrt(16+48) = 8 (or choose -8, if you plug in x = -4)
But then f_0(x) = f_1(x) = 8, so solving f_2(x) will be exactly the same as f_1(x), and so on for f_3, f_4, etc. It will always ultimately reduce to:
2x = sqrt(64)
No matter what n you choose x=4 and x=-4 will be the only solutions.
If you want to try to solve them non-recursively, it quickly gets cumbersome (at least if you do it by hand):
f_2: x^4 - 4x^2 - 192 = 0
f_3: x^8 - 8x^6 + 16x^4 - 576x^2 - 27648 = 0
etc...
|
Posted by tomarken
on 2006-11-19 19:45:48 |