Let us define an x-pandigital word, where A=1,B=2,C=3, etc., as an English word such that the concatenated digits 0 to x of the positional letter-values are used exactly once. In order for a word to be a true x-pandigital word all digits between 0 and x, and only digits 0 to x, must be used exactly once.
What are the shortest and longest x-pandigital words*?
A zeroless x-pandigital word is a word with the same constraints as an x-pandigital word, but excludes the digit 0. What are the shortest and longest zeroless x-pandigital words?
*More than one possible word may exist for both shortest and longest. The length of an x-pandigital word can be less or equal to length x. As such, an x-pandigital word that uses more digits is considered longer for words otherwise of the same length.
You may provide as many x-pandigital words you find, even those that are neither the smallest or largest. An example of an x-pandigital word where x=5 is CENT {C=3, E=5, N=14, T=20}. The concatenated value of CENT is 351420, composed of the digits (not numbers) 0 thru 5.
(In reply to
computer solutions by Charlie)
I'm impressed as to the expanse of your dictionary, yet your list found more than x-pandigital words as defined:
"In order for a word to be a true x-pandigital word all digits between 0 and x, and only digits 0 to x, must be used exactly once."
The list should be much, much smaller, as each digit is to be used only once in each word.
From your list, only the following are true x-pandigital words:
len
x wrd num word and numeric value
2 2 3 at 120
2 2 3 ta 201
3 3 4 act 1320
3 3 4 cat 3120
5 4 6 cent 351420
From your list, only the following are true zeroless x-pandigital words:
len
x wrd num word and numeric value
1 1 1 a 1
2 2 2 ab 12
2 2 2 ba 21
3 2 3 aw 123
3 3 3 cab 312
4 3 4 cud 3214
4 3 4 daw 4123
4 3 4 wad 2314
5 3 5 cox 31524
5 3 5 dow 41523
5 3 5 new 14523
5 3 5 wen 23514
There is at least one longer valid true x-pandigital word.
As to the zeroless true x-pandigital words, there is one longer word. Though it is found in a modern dictionary, it is considered Scottish, archaic, thus some would argue as to its validity.
Edited on November 8, 2012, 4:41 am
|
Posted by Dej Mar
on 2012-11-08 01:25:56 |