Suppose the witch weighs W pounds, and the duck weighs D pounds. Also, suppose their average weight is A pounds. (Their combined weight is 2A)
W + D = 2A. (Given)
W = 2A - D. (Subtract D)
W - 2A = -D (Subtract 2A)
W(W - 2A) = W(-D) (Multiply by W)
W(W - 2A) = (2A - D)(-D) (Substitute 2A-D for W using the given equation)
W² - 2AW = -2AD + D² (Distribute)
W² - 2AW + A² = D² - 2AD + A² (Add A²)
(W-A)(W-A)=(D-A)(D-A). (Factor)
(W-A)² = (D-A)². (An expression times itself equals the expression squared)
(W-A) = (D-A) (Square root)
W = D (Add A)
In other words, a witch weighs the same as a duck.
Where did I go wrong?
The anomaly stems from the step:
(W-A)^2 = (D-A)^2
=> W-A = D-A
In reality, however, we must have:
(W-A)^2 = (D-A)^2
=> W-A = D-A or, W-A = - (D-A)
Now, we know that :
A= Average (W, D) implying inter-alia that:
W >A >D
Then, considering the former CASE, we observe that:
W- A is a positive quantity, but D-A is a negative quantity. This is a contradiction.
Accordingly, the equality W-A = D-A is untenable.
Considering the latter case, we have:
W-A = -(D-A)
=> W+D = 2A
=> A =(W+ D)/2 = Average (W, D)
This equality is inclusive of the given conditions and therefore true.
Consequently, both the cases should have been considered and succinct analysis made of the foregoing before drawing the erroneous conclusion based on a single case.
Edited on July 16, 2022, 10:22 pm